Tuesday, 26 October 2021

Rice

by Michele Lee

seen at the Orange Tree Theatre Richmond on 21 October 2021

Matthew Xia (artistic director of the Actors Touring Company) directs Zainab Hasan as Nisha and Sarah Lam as Yvette in a production designed by Hyemi Shin of Michele Lee's intriguing play Rice, a co-production by the Orange Tree Theatre and the Actors Touring Copany.

Nisha is an ambitious executive in an Australian company hoping to take over the management of India's distribution of rice (the 'public distribution system' or PDS). Yvette is an older Hmong woman who is a cleaner in the Melbourne office where Nisha works. Their initial encounters are extremely abrasive, but gradually a friendship develops, buffeted though it is by each woman's personal and business problems. During the course of the play we see the pressures confronting these two women through family expectation - Yvette has always been denigrated by her family, and has a particularly unsympathetic daughter, while Nisha struggles to make her mark in the masculine world of big business, taking risks which rebound against her and dealing with condescending assumptions about her connections to India (she is presumably Australian-born). Intriguingly, it is not only the men in her business who are ruthless: her liaison with a feamle official in an Indian government department is fraught with power plays and proves quite poisonous.

In an aseptic white set - white floor, white office desk and attachments, a white sunken space which acts as a sluice for water used in cleaning - the story of the business project is played out, but vertiginously the two actors take on other roles to show what happens, and the scene moves seamlessly from Nisha's office to other spaces in Melbourne and various sites in India. We also see Yvette's awkward struggle to protect her daughter from prosecution for a principled assault on the CEO of a polluting company. 

At times the transformations of character take place at great speed, but with carefully managed inflections of accent and characteristic stances and movements we are almost always clear about whom we are seeing and where we are. The accents are perhaps a little overdone at times (the Eastern European manager of the cleaning contractors is rather too much of a caricature, and the Australian accents are valiant but clearly not native), but the overall effect successfully opens out the different cut-throat worlds in which these two women have to navigate their lives.

As a corrective to the predominantly male-dominated interpretations of the business world Rice is an important piece of work; with no men actually on stage we see more clearly Nisha's frustrations and sense the almost impersonal oppression a woman can so often feel with powerful men calling the shots, often acting behind her back while being patronising to her face. Likewise, Yvette, though used to a lifetime of men in her family defining her place and her character, here has a chance to exhibit her resilience and her anger. Zainab Hasan and Sarah Lam show a dazzling technical skill in bringing this remarkable text to life.


Friday, 8 October 2021

The Tragedy of Macbeth

by William Shakespeare

seen at the Almeida Theatre on 7 October 2021

Yaël Farber directs James McArdle in the title role and Saoirse Ronan as Lady Macbeth in a compelling production of one of Shakespeare's more difficult plays to stage. The potent brew of notorious witches, prophecies that come true because they are known about, and others that come true with cruel twists, combined with violent action and unsympathetic protagonists all too often leads to overblown or unbalanced results on stage. Here at the Almeida the pitfalls are avoided, and the director has made some interesting adjustments to the text to create a stark vision of inexorable catastrophe.

What to do with the language? The Scottish court spoke with Scottish accents: only the witches, Lady Macduff and the children did not. This worked surprisingly well once the ear had adjusted to it; Shakespearean cadences resonate just as easily in these voices as in 'received pronunciation'.

What to do with the witches? The presumed mindset of the original audience is no longer available to us, and indeed these witches in particular with their incantatory rhymes have become so stereotypical that they can seem like a joke. Farber has renamed them 'Wyrd Sisters' (having noticed that they are named 'Weird Sisters' in the folio cast list), and the programme notes draw attention to the many manifestations of three women guarding, creating or spinning Fate (Anglo-Saxon 'wyrd') in European myths. Thus there are no old crones cackling over a disgusting cauldron. Instead three enigmatic women, almost serene in their dispassionate presence, may be seen not only when they appear to Macbeth and Banquo, and later to Macbeth alone; they are also visible as silent observers of the outworking of Fate at many other moments during the play - possibly at all moments, though there is a good deal of mist billowing about which makes the back wall of the stage invisible at times.

What to do with the violent action? Macbeth is a bloody play, with unpleasant murders both off and on stage. There were two perspex screens often moved about the stage demarcating inner and outer spaces (part of a brilliant set design by Soutra Gilmour). A director might easily have splashed them copiously with blood starting with the execution of the rebel Thane of Cawdor near the beginning of the play; the murder of Duncan might even have been mimed behind a screen with further opportunity for spraying blood. In this production matters were more restrained, and all the more disquieting for that. At the opening tableau the whole cast gathered on stage to a persistent thrum of a low musical note above which a single cello line wavered. An attendant woman brought on a wheelbarrow full of boots and upended it, then carefully placed them at the front of the stage. A soldier washed himself from a bucket, but what he daubed over himself was blood, since a blood-soaked messenger brings the news of victory to Duncan. Similarly, bloodstains were always restricted only to the bodies of actors - either Macbeth and Lady Macbeth after the murder of Duncan, or Banquo when he appears as a ghost - and not used at all elsewhere, even during the on-stage murders. This made the deaths of Lady Macduff  and her two sons all the more chilling, especially as one child was dragged screaming from a hiding place and the lady herself was ultimately dispatched in a tub of water.

What to do with the disintegration of Lady Macbeth towards the end of the play? Lady Macbeth is a driving force in the first half of the play, but increasingly cut off from her husband's plans and inner torment once he has become king. Then, at the end, there is the famous sleepwalking scene, with little to prepare us for it. Farber has created a daring visualisation of  the trauma precipitating this downfall. She has Lady Macbeth bring the advice to Lady Macduff that she should flee with her children, and then still be present to witness the murders. It is preposterous on a realistic level, but psychologically extremely acute, and Saoirse Ronan utterly convinces in showing the trembling panic of an unwilling witness to such babarity. Naked ambition in the abstract, so forcefully embraced by this woman at the beginning of this play, here confronts the horror of its consequences on real lives, and the strain is too much: a brilliant stroke.

What to do about Macbeth? Make him passionate, ambitious, uncertain about murder at the beginning but plausibly easy with the idea as his obsessions take control, completely unaware of the irony (and foolishness) in his determination to connive at the fulfilment of prophecy when it is to his advantage but to attempt to outwit it when it is detrimental. Make the famous lines of despair at the news of his wife's death deeply felt, not just cynical world-weariness. Give the part to James McArdle who conveys initial doubts over murdering Duncan, horror at the deed, abject terror at the appearance of Banquo's ghost and steely resolve to fight to the last, with equal skill and authority.

What do do about the Porter defusing the tension of the murder scene with long disquisitions about equivocation, a subject of no interest to a modern audience? Dispense with him completely, along with the more lurid witches' hocus pocus. In fact a number of other scenes were streamlined or omitted, making for sharper emphasis and an unremitting atmosphere of tension. I am not sure, but I think I even missed the explicit instruction for soldiers to disguise their numbers by cutting branches from the trees at Birnam Wood (a vital point in destabilising Macbeth's self-assurance, which was cunningly foreshadowed by the procession of Banquo's heirs presented to an anguished Macbeh during his final encounter with the Wyrd Sisters). There was no evocation of the holy stability of the English realm under Edward the Confessor to contrast with the dire state of Scotland or the peculiar defensiveness of prince Malcolm when Macduff confronts him. 

There was no final speech by the new king after the death of the tyrant Macbeth. Instead, the surviving cast gathered again in almost the same positions as at the beginning; the wheelbarrow of boots appeared, and one of the three Wyrd Sisters pronouned once more the opening question: 'When shall we three meet again?'. Malcolm was in the spotlight rather than Duncan, but Fate, evidently, is cyclical.